Open Services - saving money and saving ICT support posts

Originally posted to Naace's Advisory Talk List

For Local Authorities the world has changed for us all with the recent cuts to HT Grant and it is very clear that IT support services and products that we currently provide will not be provided next year. This is likely to have a serious detrimental impact on Local Authority staff employed in supporting ICT.......unless we quickly put in a cost effective way of providing ICT services to schools that incorporates these valuable people and yet is a lower cost than before. I firmly believe that this can be done through the implementation of open services.

 Essentially the construction of Open Services means that you start with the aim of removing every single 'software' licence and replace with licence free products. Your starting point is to assess what this may save by looking at the cost of every single licence paid from SIMS to Learning Platforms, from Digital Learning Resources to server and desktop. This also includes all expenditure from school budgets as your final Open Service proposal will inevitably fall to funding from school budgets. Second stage will be to break down the costs into small projects some with easy implementation, others carrying risk but all of them involving what will now be your main resource, your staff, as it is the retention of staff doing entirely different duties that will be one of the main products of this sustainable model.

On the face of it, it seems a difficult challenge but there are a large number of quick wins with National Digital Resource Bank, Moodle and even content filtering. SIMS will take a little longer but check out how much you spend on that at the moment!

In parallel to looking at these costs you will also need to understand what contractual obligations you have and when contracts for these licence based services cease so you can draw up a list of ones to replace and in what order.

You will need some help to justify the introduction of Open Services but there will never be a greater need, nor such a set of circumstances that will exist as the ones that do now. Without doing this we will lose many valuable support staff when we could simply have reconfigured what we provide and how we provide it.

Over the summer North West Learning Grid will be working with a number of its Local Authorities to look at financial baselines, products, template SLAs and staffing roles needed to introduce Open Services as a support model for all of your schools that you can provide - a model which will be the most economic way of maintaining ICT that your schools will be able to obtain. I implore you not to just look at ways of reducing costs just by buying less and having less staff, but by reconfiguring what you provide for a world without the Harnessing Technology Grant. Plan for the future because schools will still need ICT support, they will still need yourselves and your support staff.

If you want to be kept in touch with what we are doing over the summer and get the final outputs of this in September, as well as being part of a community that will work together and change the way we implement and support ICT from this point on - then simply contact me and I'll ensure you are kept informed. Equally I'm looking for information around current costs so we can work out where best to concentrate. Finally have a quick read of the article from Miles Berry below, whose knowledge is far greater than mine. Miles has written it from the viewpoint of a school capable of that level of self implementation, I'm simply just looking to put it into a financial and implementation framework so that Local Authorities can be the bringers of change and the supplier of support services and not be subject to the actions of a government clearly determined to break up existing successful models for their own ideological self indulgence.

This makes for really uplifting reading, and I really do wish you the best of luck with this endeavour.

However my feeling is that is all perhaps too little too late. When the HT funding was first released I was delighted to see that we were being told it could only be spent on capital hardware and infrastructure purchases. At last, I thought, people are going to need to think out of the box a little and adopt open source products to install on their newly purchased hardware in order to meet the HT agenda! But then, to my disappointment the schools in my area petitioned the LA and had the terms changed; we could now purchase software too, as long as it was more than a one year license.

I think it was at this point, two and half years ago, that the LA really missed a trick; and now, as you say we are facing potential funding meltdown for most LAs.

If the ICT Support model available in our LA is to survive then some serious changes need to be made, and fast! There also needs to be some quick thinking and acceptance that earlier purchases were a waste of funding, and as such are unsustainable. Now is not the time for sticking by previous mistakes just to save face.

I think those schools who will come out of all of this the best are those who have tried to provide as many of their IT services internally, using sustainable open source products, or careful purchasing of perpetual licenses.

Interestingly; point 5 in Mile's post is precisely the conclusion I have come to also; and we are now having to investigate the cost of potentially not having the LA to support our IT connectivity and license purchases.

These are interesting times indeed; and with a bit of ingenuity, I think we could see some shining examples of sustainable, open source It implementations coming out of UK schools in the next three years.

Jonwitts, you are absolutely correct, only those teams that support ICT that are agile, and open minded, enough to go quickly down the licence free route will survive, those schools that have independently moved down that direction already have sustainable ICT.

We're just going to try and make it easier by getting together a compelling argument on financial grounds and hope that there will be some enteprise level implementations of Open Source rather than see a lot of schools go backwards before they have to find a way to implement OS themselves. For a number of secondary schools, and a very few Primary schools they can do all this themselves but for the vast majority of schools they need the support of central teams and a LA team that is actively engaged with Open Source and can drive forward costs savings will be better than no support at all - with HT grant now set to go, these are now the only two options available.

 

tbateson's picture

Our schools chose to migrate towards Open Source overy 4 years ago. Not because of funding changes from the government,  using open source software left more money for spending on ICT equipment and often met and surpassed our needs in relation to commercial software. So LAs converting to OSS, would seem to be a choice they would not have taken if funding was not cut. That is going to be tough to market/advertise to schools to buy into services that were not the LAs first choice!

Most of the educational organisations that I know that use OSS are secondary schools and not LAs. By targeting LAs  you seem to be excluding schools that are already using OSS?  Given that schools will be the customers  of what you are proposing, why not involve schools the process. Why not get involved in this thread which is looking to create community supported turnkey oss sulutions.

In relation to costs a sore point with me about LAs is that services are often lumped together and there is room to negotiate buying the services a school actually wants. I can provide details of costs that relate to our broadband contract that seems to cover all sorts of other services that most schools in our area don't use. I have also documented how OSS has changed our spending and what value has been added to our curriculum by comparing what we use to commercial products.

 

 

monkeyx,

Not excluding schools that have already implemented OS simply because they are already ahead of the curve. This is an opportunity to encourage LAs to change their traditional model of licenced products and implement OS at enterprise level - simply out of necessity.

The reality is that if LAs do not offer services based on OS then they will not exist at all next year, if they are not flexible, again they will not exist. Life and funding has just changed. Those secondary schools that have blazed their own trail will continue to do so but there has to be a low cost, flexible alternative for the many schools that do not have the confidence, skills or knowledge necessary to do it themselves and therefore still need a cost effective service from their LAs.

Will this mean that Open Source in UK schools, will finally 'arrive' next year. I don't know but I do know that providing a clear direction based on reducing costs will help considerably in future take-up.

 

tbateson's picture

Was that a yes or a no for helping build community resources that can be used by schools and LAs alike ?

Tim

Hi Tim,

 

It's a yes - but my focus is about quickly growing the Open Source community to something much larger through encouraging LAs to help their schools move over to Open Source en masse. Bigger community equals more resources and the nature of Open Source means bigger benefits and accelerated development.

IanL's picture

 In general, Open Source has been sadly lacking in strategy. When schools ban Wikipedia we have a fundamental problem. (something I'm coming across with increasing regularity) They are not seeing a key benefit in that the learners have access to a massive graphics library they know they can re-use because it is licensed to be. Images from general internet searches are not safe to use in e-portfolios, images from Wikipedia are. This is just one small example where there needs to be a real shift in education including CPD.  The death by Powerpoint scenario really needs to be killed off. We need learners using generic, freely available tools to document their own learning pathways and eventually create their own learning resources. Open Source will enable this higher level learning. Putting PPTs together first in primary school, again in KS3 and yet again in KS4 is philistinism of the highest order masquerading as education. LAs are at least partly to blame for the "ban it" culture and need to start encouraging schools to see opportunities as well as threats. We don't ban books simply because there are some dodgy publications about. 

So for strategy we need to encourage a shift from proprietary desktop applications, most notable MS Office to freely available web based resources that are open standards compliant. LAs need to seriously question the cost of learning platforms, e-portfolios etc when those services can be provided at no cost from established mainstream generic tools. We need to encourage learners to be responsible so we can trust them to use freely available resources safely rather than trying to ban anything that might have some remote adverse possibility. 

IanL's picture

Gary has already produced resources that can be used by both LAs and schools. There are constraints due to trading and competition rules. Certainly fragmentation of effort is an issue - really economies of scale are where FOSS can make real gains but there still needs to be some mechanism to support development. If LA money funds FOSS "competitor apps" to proprietary products you can be certain that the proprietary suppliers will cry unfair competition if the LA allows use outside its own boundaries. This whole area needs a rethink because there are bizarre consequences like the NHS paying more in software licenses for limited use of an office suite than the entire cost of buying the code of an equivalent product. Personally I think web apps are the way forward because they are lower cost to develop, platform agnostic, much less expensive to maintain etc. There really are no good reasons for most educational apps not to work through a standards compliant browser. So I would drive LAs to put pressure on suppliers, whether FOSS or proprietary to develop to W3C standards and open source infrastructure like Java and Javascript - BECTA could have done that but didn't.  500 million on COL could have driven that but didn't. Now is the time for change despite the criminally wasteful missed opportunities. As Gary says, some risk and doing things different is necessary. Maybe the alternative risks are greater - ask BECTA and QCDA.

johnyma22's picture

I run loads of free resources for primary schools, I don't think this a yes/no thing.  The resources will come irrespective, either as free and open source (how i make mine) or as closed commercial products.

What I would say is that we should all be supporting FOSS publicly and trying to promote it as much as possible both offline and on.  I have a searchable resource for primary schools FOSS and free web services available here.  Fear the worlds longest link. Sorry if that isn't any help for LA's/HE/FE but Primary is my focus :)

johnyma22's picture

Hrm I thought also shared my blog post on 7 ways to cut spending on ICT in a primary school.  I guess not..

I like the leaves on the captcha =)